Show and Do

For the week of March 1, 2025 / 1 Adar 5785

Message info along with an illustration of the Israelite mishkan (tabernacle) in the wilderness

Terumah; Rosh Hodesh; Shekalim
Torah: Shemot/Exodus 25:1 – 27:19; B’midbar/Numbers 28:9–15
Haftarah: 2 Kings 12:1–17 (English: 11:21 – 2 16)
Originally posted the week of February 20, 2021 / 8 Adar 5781

Exactly as I show you concerning the pattern of the tabernacle, and of all its furniture, so you shall make it. (Shemot/Exodus 25:9)

There are two major sections in the second book of the Torah that are concerned about the building of the mishkan, usually translated into English as “tabernacle.” It was a large, yet mobile, complex designed as the locale for the offering of sacrifices and other priestly functions on behalf of the nation of Israel. Mishkan means, “dwelling place,” as it was to represent God’s dwelling among his people. This week’s parsha (English: Torah reading portion) through chapter thirty contains the instructions of the mishkan, its furnishings, and other related items, including the priests’ clothing and recipes for the special oil and incense. Then the actual construction is described beginning in chapter thirty-five through the end of the book, chapter forty.

Various people have attempted to draw or build accurate images or models – including life-sized versions – of the mishkan, but there is no way to ensure accuracy due to a missing ingredient in the instructions recorded by Moses. It appears that he was privy to something besides the details we read in the Torah. Not only did God tell him what to do, he also showed it to him. Because Moses saw what to do, he could also instruct the people on how to do it.

Before I continue, a word about the so-called Oral Torah. Jewish tradition claims that when God gave Moses his word to write down, he also told him other things that he did not write down, but instead was to be passed on orally. One of the main purposes of the Oral Torah is to interpret the written Torah. The Mishnah, which is the core of the Talmud is the written version of the Oral Torah. A scriptural basis for the Mishnah is the verse we are looking at, since it suggests that Moses was made aware of certain aspects of God’s revelation to Israel that he didn’t write down. However, this is no way legitimizes an oral tradition that most certainly was developed over time. Just because Moses was equipped with more than the written instructions for the Mishkan here doesn’t prove anything about other later rabbinic teachings.

What then might we learn from Moses’ experience of the mishkan? The people of Israel needed more than just “the what” of building it. They also needed “the how.” Throughout the ages people have abused the Bible because they thought that a simple reading was sufficient to live out its teachings. Armed with only the what, well-meaning, but otherwise naïve people have caused more damage than good. They claim to be taking God at his word but possess neither the sensitivity necessary to understand it nor his wisdom to live it out effectively.

When we read the Bible, we are not on our own. It’s a very old book, but its ultimate author is still alive. Not only that, he has made himself available to anyone who seeks him. In order to truly understand his word, we need to rely on him to show us how. This is not to say that our intuition or spiritual senses are reliable guides in themselves to understand the difficult and not-so difficult parts of scripture. The Scriptures themselves provide interpretive boundaries for us. If Moses, having recorded the mishkan instructions, claimed that God showed that they were to build a boat, then everyone would know something was not right. I know that’s an extreme example, but it makes the point clear. If an interpretation of scripture is not well-supported by scripture, we should not trust it.

The same goes for any attempt to follow God’s instructions. Through the Ruach HaKodesh (English: the Holy Spirit) God speaks to his people in various ways. But too often we fail to wait upon him for how to do what he is calling us to do. Instead, we need to wait on him to show us, and then do.

Scriptures taken from the English Standard Version

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Practical Torah

For the week of February 22, 2025 / 24 Shevat 5785

Message info with photo of a Torah scroll

Mishpatim
Torah: Shemot/Exodus 21:1 – 24:18
Haftarah: Jeremiah 34:8-22; 33:25-26
Originally posted the week of February 6, 2016 / 27 Shevat 5776 (updated)

Now these are the rules that you shall set before them (Shemot/Exodus 21:1)

Last week’s parsha (weekly Torah reading portion) included the giving of the Ten Words (commonly known as the Ten Commandments). As I explained in a previous TorahBytes message, the Ten Words represent the covenant God established with the people of Israel through Moses at Mount Sinai. Accepting them as eternal principles simply because they are the Ten Commandments or rejecting them as Old Testament relics fails to regard their covenantal function. With the coming of Yeshua and the inauguration of the New Covenant as promised by the prophet Jeremiah (see Jeremiah 31:31-33; compare Luke 22:20), the constitution of God’s people underwent a significant transformation. That which was given on tablets of stone has been internalized as Jeremiah had foretold (see 2 Corinthians 3:3). The life that God had called Israel to live was no longer something outside and out of reach, so to speak, but instead to be lived from the inside out. The alienation from God, which had prevented Israel from living up to the Sinai covenantal demands, was resolved by the forgiveness of sin brought about through Yeshua’s sacrificial death.

Therefore, the main contrast between the Sinai and New Covenants is found—not primarily in their practical details—but in the contrasting constitutional arrangements within which the details are given. The older covenant provides for the organization of a national entity; the newer one enables the inclusion of all nations without requiring specific membership in Israel. The great change in the sacrificial system from ongoing and temporal to final and permanent makes the older priestly function obsolete and thus allows all believers to approach God directly.

But just because the covenantal foundations have changed, that doesn’t mean that every God-given directive through Moses is no longer relevant. For it is in the Torah that we encounter almost every aspect of life from God’s perspective. Discerning which elements of God’s “teaching” (for that’s what “torah” means) were for ancient Israel alone and which ones are for all people for all times can be a challenge, but a worthwhile and enriching one.

Through Torah, we are reminded that relationship with God is not something detached from life’s practicalities. While abstract notions of love and forgiveness are essential, it is through the directives of Torah that the core of our faith is expressed in very practical ways. When reading the first section of this week’s Torah portion, you might wonder if that is really true. The subject of slaves in the Bible is often used to demonstrate how backward it is. But what we actually have here is God’s speaking into a world where slavery was taken for granted. The boundaries and regulations God established through Moses emphasize the value of all human beings. This would have been radical for those days and sets the stage for its eventual abolishment. How’s that for being practical?

Our portion continues by addressing personal liability. We are privileged to be given God’s mind regarding common issues like those people have faced throughout history. We neglect God’s word on these matters to our peril.

In another section in this week’s reading, we also see the consequences of certain types of social behavior, including premarital sex, bestiality, and sorcery, as well as dealing with the vulnerable members of society: foreigners, widows, and orphans. As with the slavery section, modern readers might too quickly react to the prescribed consequences for certain behaviors rather than glean wisdom from God’s perspective. The determining of consequences is subject to the jurisdiction of civil leaders, which, while regulated under Sinai for ancient Israel, is not expanded to the nations under the New Covenant. But we can derive from this an understanding of the destructive nature of the things addressed so that they can be avoided among believers and discouraged within the cultures in which we find ourselves.

This is what Yeshua meant when he told his followers that they are “salt and light” (see Matthew 5:13-16). As the great Master Rabbi, he expounded the teachings of Moses so that they (and us!) could learn the practical details of Torah within a New Covenant framework.

Scriptures taken from the English Standard Version

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

What’s with the Sabbath?

For the week of February 15, 2025 / 17 Shevat 5785

Message information over a poster on an easel with the words, Ask Me a Bible Question

Yitro
Torah: Shemot/Exodus 18:1 – 20:23
Haftarah: Isaiah 6:1 – 7:6; 9:5-6 (English Isaiah 6:1 – 7:6; 9:6-7)
Originally posted the week of February 18, 2017 / 22 Shevat 5777 (updated)

Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor, and do all your work, but the seventh day is a Sabbath to the LORD your God. On it you shall not do any work, you, or your son, or your daughter, your male servant, or your female servant, or your livestock, or the sojourner who is within your gates. For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested on the seventh day. Therefore the LORD blessed the Sabbath day and made it holy. (Shemot/Exodus 20:8-11)

I was in Vancouver, Canada, some years ago to participate in an event. Over three days, thousands of people gathered at one of the city’s largest venues to hear speakers on a variety of biblical topics. My ministry was one of over two hundred with displays, small and large. Weeks before the event, I was discussing with one of my daughters what I might do to encourage people to interact with my display. She suggested I make a simple sign with the words, “Ask me a Bible question!” This indeed led to some very interesting discussions.

One interaction didn’t go so well, however. In the name of asking me a question, the person chose to harshly lecture me on the Sabbath. In the end, they questioned my eternal future with God because I wouldn’t fully subscribe to their perspective, which is too bad since this is a critical and often neglected issue.

So, as briefly as I can, I will share what I believe to be a sound biblical perspective on the Sabbath. First, in whatever way we may derive universal moral principles from the Ten Commandments (of which the Sabbath command is a part), it is primarily a cornerstone of the covenant given by God to the people of Israel through Moses at Mt. Sinai. As the special ten, they represented the whole of the covenant, which includes many other directives covering every aspect of Israelite society. This is why the tablets of the Ten Commandments were to be included in the Ark of the Covenant, stored in the Most Holy Place within the Tabernacle and later the Temple.

Unlike the earlier covenant God made with Israel through Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, which was unconditional and eternal, the Sinai Covenant through Moses was conditional and temporary. As a covenant, it was broken by the people of Israel by their repeatedly turning to other gods. God’s response to the breaking of the Sinai Covenant was the New Covenant promised through the prophet Jeremiah (see Jeremiah 31:31-33) and instituted by the Messiah (see Luke 22:20).

The New Covenant internalizes much of the Sinai Covenant’s essence and permanently establishes a right relationship with God. As a system of law, therefore, the Sinai Covenant is no longer in effect. Therefore, the Ten Commandments as representative of the Sinai Covenant aren’t binding. This doesn’t mean that the principles they represent are to be neglected necessarily, since biblically speaking, they are clearly eternal, universal principles, like so many of the other directives contained in the Sinai Covenant. However, applying the Sabbath beyond the confines of ancient Israel isn’t straightforward. As the early followers of Yeshua began to teach God’s Truth to non-Jews, while they taught principles based on Old Covenant Scripture, including the Ten Commandments, they warned against the imposition of Sabbath law (e.g., Galatians 2:16; Colossians 4:10). Why is that?

Unlike the other nine and many other directives revealed by God through Moses, Sabbath keeping includes more than the moral and spiritual components of other commands. By regulating the workweek, Sabbath also addresses society in general. Not only would it be impossible for people outside the Jewish world to effectively observe Sabbath by demanding the cessation of work, it would also cause an unnecessary clash with the pagan world of that day.

Does that mean, therefore, that Sabbath has no place whatsoever among Yeshua’s followers? For much of history, Sabbath has been central to the lives of believers. It is thought that the Sabbath was changed from the seventh day (Saturday) to the first (Sunday) due to Yeshua’s resurrection and the early believers meeting on that day. Actually, there is very little evidence of what occurred and why. Nevertheless, for most of the past two thousand years, believing communities have almost always determined that some sort of Sabbath-keeping was to be implemented. In my opinion, they were right to do so because even though Sabbath keeping was not to be imposed upon believers from among the nations, it is clearly an important principle of Scripture stemming back to the giving of the Sinai Covenant. While the Sabbath, as expressed in the Ten Commandments, is specific to Israel under the Sinai Covenant, it is rooted in creation (Bereshit/Genesis 2:1-3) and also reveals God’s perspective on the need for rest. The need for rest is not just about self, but also for those under our care, even including animals. Therefore, why would we not seek to implement such a principle that obviously expresses God’s understanding of life, work, and rest?

By not imposing their particular implementation of Sabbath, the early Jewish believers gave non-Jewish communities the opportunity to develop culturally appropriate expressions of Sabbath over time, which is precisely what they did. They did, that is, until more recently when it has just about been forgotten altogether.

While we are not mandated to impose Sabbath keeping upon one another, we would be well advised to seek God and the Scriptures to appropriately apply the Sabbath within our communities today. This includes speaking into the society at large, encouraging civil governments to return to the godly rhythm of rest exemplified by the Creator himself.

Scriptures taken from the English Standard Version

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Whatness

For the week of February 8, 2025 / 10 Shevat 5785

Message info over an image of the Israelites gathering manna from a neo-gothic fresco, Trnava, Slovakia

B’shallach
Torah: Shemot/Exodus 13:17 – 17:16
Haftarah: Shoftim/Judges 4:4 – 5:31

When the people of Israel saw it, they said to one another, “What is it?” For they did not know what it was. And Moses said to them, “It is the bread that the LORD has given you to eat. (Shemot/ Exodus 16:15)

As I was looking over this week’s parsha (weekly Torah reading portion), the story of the manna caught my eye, which led me to check out its Hebrew background. The very popular Strong’s concordance of the Bible[1], includes a suggested definition for the supposed root of the word “manna” as: “literally, a whatness (so to speak).”[2]

According to the Cambridge Dictionary, “whatness” is “the quality of something that makes it what it is and different from other things.[3] Take trees, for example. A tree’s whatness is its unique combination of attributes that makes it distinct from other things, such as a root system, trunk, branches, leaves or needles, and perhaps especially its woodiness. Strong’s use of “whatness” for the manna is especially interesting because it’s in a category all its own. It cannot be grouped together with anything else in existence. Therefore, its “whatness” is found solely in its relation to itself. In other words, it is what it is.

When the people of Israel first encountered the manna, they were dumbfounded. They had never seen anything like it. That’s because there wasn’t anything like it. Eventually, they would discover it didn’t behave like anything else in all creation. If they took too much for their family between the first and fifth days of the week, it would go bad. And yet, on the sixth day, they were to take double the daily amount since none would appear on Shabbat, the seventh day. This would continue for forty years until they entered the Promised Land when it abruptly stopped. As far as we know, manna is the only food substance to have ever existed that provided everything needed, in addition to water, for a human’s daily nourishment. None of this would have been known to the Israelites on the first day they encountered it. But they knew it was something most special. They looked at it. They touched it. They tasted it. And all they could say was something like, “What?”

Many theologically minded people like the concept of “mystery” to describe the unknowns of God and life. Regarding the manna, its whatness, that which makes it what it is, might be described as a mystery. Indeed, much of what makes manna manna is beyond our understanding, but that should not be a barrier to truly experiencing it to its fullest extent. And that goes for both those who literally partook of it and the rest of us who encounter it in Scripture.

The manna didn’t only sustain the people of Israel for forty years in a most inhospitable environment; it demonstrated God’s provision and was designed to teach the people to rely on God’s Word. As we read:

And he humbled you and let you hunger and fed you with manna, which you did not know, nor did your fathers know, that he might make you know that man does not live by bread alone, but man lives by every word that comes from the mouth of the LORD (D’varim/Deuteronomy 8:3).

To understand the essence of the manna was not to be found in its unknowns but in its knowns, its profound and complex whatness. I wonder how often we miss God’s own whatness because we can’t figure him out or understand what’s happening. But should we allow our inability to understand God and life to get in the way of our fully experiencing him? Perhaps you are in a situation right now that makes you want to say, “What?” If so, may God help you see it for what it is so that it can accomplish what God wants in and through you.

Scriptures taken from the English Standard Version


[1] “A concordance is a comprehensive index of the words used in a text or a body of texts. Ordinarily it will not only index but also cite all passages in which a given word occurs” (https://guides.library.queensu.ca/english/concordances-quotations).
[2] https://www.blueletterbible.org/lexicon/h4478/nasb20/wlc/0-1/
[3] https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/whatness

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail