For the week of April 22, 2017 / 26 Nissan 5777
Torah: Vayikra/Leviticus 9:1 – 11:47
Haftarah: 2 Samuel 6:1 – 7:17
Download Audio [Right click link to download]
Speak to the people of Israel, saying, These are the living things that you may eat among all the animals that are on the earth. (Vayikra/Leviticus 11:2)
One of the essential features of the covenant God gave the people of Israel at Mt. Sinai is the directives concerning what kinds of meat were permissible to eat. Only animals which met certain criteria from the various categories of mammals, birds, fish, and insects were allowed to be consumed. Why exactly only mammals that chew their cud and have split hooves or fish that have both fins and scales could be eaten is not explained.
This hasn’t stopped people from trying to guess. Is there something about the design of these animals in contrast to those who didn’t meet the specified criteria that represented something about God or life? Perhaps, but since this is not explicitly stated, then it’s pure speculation, of which I am leery. Are these animals heathier to eat than others? The English words used to describe the categories of permitted vs. not permitted are “clean” and “unclean.” To the contemporary reader this may imply “healthy” and “unhealthy,” which these foods might be, but that’s not how clean and unclean function in the Torah. These terms have to do with being ritually fit for service. Encountering something unclean, be it food or anything else, renders one ceremonially unfit to engage the ancient sacrificial system.
One possibility may have to do with the way awareness of clean and unclean foods would help create a general sensitivity with regard to what is acceptable and what is not. As we see in our own day, discerning right from wrong is not natural. We need to be taught the difference. Having to always be careful about what goes into our mouths may train us to be careful about other aspects of life as well.
Whatever the reasons for these directives, one of the outcomes of this strict culinary lifestyle is that it creates a closed community. God’s forbidding the eating of certain foods made it impossible for the people to socialize with the surrounding cultures, since they followed no such diet. It’s understandable that since Israel’s neighbors heartily consumed unclean cuisine, that Israel would regard foreigners themselves as unclean.
It is commonly asserted that with the coming of Yeshua, the Torah food laws where discarded. Certainly these directives are implicated by the Messiah’s instituting of the New Covenant, but not in the way usually assumed. The oft quoted passage, Mark 7:19, is more of a criticism of the misguided religious obsession of ritual over heart, than a statement about the new status of pork, etc.
But that doesn’t mean that God intended to preserve the food laws into the New Covenant period. Peter learned this when God prepared him to make his first official visit to a Gentile home as an emissary of the Messiah.
Those who think the food laws still apply like to point out that Peter’s vision in which God told him to eat unclean animals was not mainly about the animals, but rather the Jewish mindset toward Gentiles as expressed in his comment: “God has shown me that I should not call any person common or unclean” (Acts 10:28). While his vision is indeed first and foremost about people, the food issue is certainly implied, since there is no way to fully interact with foreign cultures without sharing what they eat.
This doesn’t mean that Jewish believers or anyone else may not retain scruples over food. Not only do the New Covenant Writings mention this, but they encourage us to be sensitive toward the scruples of others for love’s sake (see Romans 14:1 – 15:13). But if we are called unto a foreign culture, we need to be ready to enjoy all sorts of fare that we may not prefer.
One more thing. While it is clear that the early Jewish followers of Yeshua were not mandated to impose food laws upon the Gentiles (see Acts 15), thus extending freedom to believers regarding what they eat, it is conceivable that being exposed to passages such as this week’s parsha (weekly Torah portion) may alert other cultures that perhaps not everything we want to put in our mouths is good for us. I know this opens a can of worms for some. But just because we are allowed to eat worms, doesn’t mean we should.
All scriptures, English Standard Version (ESV) of the Bible
God showed this to me… A baby is crawling on the floor, finds a piece of dirt and it goes into his mouth. We fish it out and tell baby ” that’s not food”. Baby crawls around some more and we notice there is something else in his mouth…paper..we fish it out and tell baby “that’s not food”. Then we give baby a cookie and say “this is food”..God did the same thing with us. He shows us what is meant to be eaten and what is not….food or not food…it’s that simple.
Hi Allan: This is the first time that I have disagreed with your statement that the dietary laws are now rescinded because God’s word never changes. Whenever it mentions “food” in the Word, it does not imply that pork and shellfish, etc are now kosher and ok to eat because those things were never considered food. I believe that Acts 15 was given to new converts who may not have been able to accept a huge bagatelle of new rules and regulations but would be gently brought into their new understanding slowly and surely. There is no way that I would accept shellfish or pork, etc at someones home just because they would offer it to me. I would thank them and quietly assert that I did not eat such items but would enjoy the fellowship and eat the acceptable provender. If we are called into a foreign culture, I don’t believe that we would have to prepare to “enjoy” any and all things offered just because that is what they do, surely there must be other various food such as chicken, beef, goat, lamb, etc that would be available wherever we may find ourselves. I also believe that although I was once considered a gentile but now consider myself an Israelite and as such adhere to the Kosher dietary standards., as do most of the people I know who now consider themselves as part of Israel.
Reply to Richard: I wish I could agree with you on the food issue, but I don’t see how a biblical case can be made for your proposal. I also don’t believe the Bible teaches that non-Jews who believe in Yeshua become Israelites, but rather that the family of believers, while being essentially united in the Messiah, retain their national distinctives. See my book on Romans 11 for more more information on the peoplehood topic (https://www.amazon.com/God-Did-Not-Reject-People/dp/1494732858/)